ASD says beware of AI agents taking unexpected actions
The Australian Cyber Security Centre (ACSC) has issued a reminder about the careful use of AI after an AI-related cyber incident reported by ABC News on 10 August.
In that event, an AI assistant made unapproved modifications in an Australian gym-booking system to reserve classes beyond the permitted timeframe. The AI agent also removed another customer from a waiting list — an action that achieved the task the user requested in an unintended way that the user didn’t explicitly approve and that the agent was unable to reverse.
The reported incident highlights the goal misalignment and unintended behaviour risks identified in ASD’s Careful adoption of agentic AI services guidance. ASD warns that AI agents may find shortcuts or loopholes that technically achieve an objective but conflict with the user’s intention — a behaviour known as specification gaming.
Over-optimisation, ambiguous instructions, poorly enforced boundaries and the ability to exploit software vulnerabilities or security control weaknesses can also increase the risk that agents take unsafe or unexpected actions.
Individuals should restrict agentic AI use to low-risk, non-sensitive tasks and avoid granting agents broad or unrestricted access or decision-making authority. ASD recommends maintaining a human-in-the-loop to review, approve and monitor agent actions, particularly where interactions with third-party services or other users may occur.
Organisations providing online services should consider that AI agents might identify and exploit vulnerabilities at speed and scale. However, AI can also strengthen cyber defence. As outlined in ASD’s Opportunities for AI in cyber defence guidance, cyber defenders can use AI to support analysis, prioritisation and defensive decision-making.
Organisations that develop software, particularly websites and online services, should implement security and quality assurance practices appropriate to their size and risk profile, including through using AI, scanning developed software for vulnerabilities and appropriate authentication processes for users interacting with their services.
Organisations should also refer to ASD’s Defending against AI-enabled cyber attacks guidance for recommended mitigations.
ACSC updates guidance on SBOMs
The Australian Cyber Security Centre has released updated guidance on the minimum elements for a...
ASD urges care in the adoption of agentic AI for cyber defence
Care must be taken in the deployment of agentic AI in the wake of news that models being tested...
ASD issues advice on assessing vendor PQC readiness
New guidance helps organisations assess vendor readiness for post-quantum cryptography.
