One-quarter of organisations banning GenAI use over privacy and data security risks: study

Cisco

Tuesday, 30 January, 2024

One-quarter of organisations banning GenAI use over privacy and data security risks: study

Cisco has released its global 2024 Data Privacy Benchmark Study, an annual review of key privacy issues and their impact on business. The findings highlight the growing privacy concerns with GenAI, trust challenges facing organisations over their use of AI and the attractive returns from privacy investment. Drawing on responses from 2600 privacy and security professionals across 12 geographies around the world, the seventh edition of the Benchmark shows that privacy is much more than a regulatory compliance matter.

Growing privacy concerns with generative AI

“Organisations see GenAI as a fundamentally different technology with novel challenges to consider,” said Dev Stahlkopf, Cisco Chief Legal Officer. “More than 90% of respondents believe AI requires new techniques to manage data and risk. This is where thoughtful governance comes into play. Preserving customer trust depends on it.”

Among the top concerns, businesses cited the threats to an organisation’s legal and intellectual property rights (69%) and the risk of disclosure of information to the public or competitors (68%).

Most organisations are aware of these risks and are putting in place controls to limit exposure: 63% have established limitations on what data can be entered, 61% have limits on which GenAI tools can be used by employees and 27% said their organisation had banned GenAI applications altogether for the time being. Nonetheless, many individuals have entered information that could be problematic, including employee information (45%) or non-public information about the company (48%).

Concerns with GenAI.

Concerns with GenAI. For a clearer image click here.

Slow progress on AI and transparency

Consumers are concerned about AI use involving their data today, and yet 91% of organisations recognise they need to do more to reassure their customers that their data was being used only for intended and legitimate purposes in AI. This is similar to last year’s levels, suggesting that not much progress has been achieved.

Organisations’ priorities to build consumer trust differ from those of individuals. Consumers identified their top priorities as getting clear information on exactly how their data is being used and not having their data sold for marketing purposes. When asked the same question, businesses identified their top priorities as complying with privacy laws (25%) and avoiding data breaches (23%). It suggests additional attention on transparency would be helpful — especially with AI applications where it may be difficult to understand how the algorithms make their decisions.

Privacy and trust: the role of external certifications and laws

Organisations recognise the need to reassure their customers about how their data is being used, and 98% said that external privacy certifications are an important factor in their buying decisions.

“94% of respondents said their customers would not buy from them if they did not adequately protect data,” explained Harvey Jang, Cisco Vice President and Chief Privacy Officer. “They are looking for hard evidence the organisation can be trusted. Privacy has become inextricably tied to customer trust and loyalty. This is even more true in the era of AI, where investing in privacy better positions organisations to leverage AI ethically and responsibly.”

Despite the costs and requirements privacy laws may impose on organisations, 80% of respondents said privacy laws have had a positive impact on them, and only 6% said the impact has been negative. Strong privacy regulation boosts consumer confidence and trust in the organisations they choose to share their data with.

Further, many governments and organisations are putting in place data localisation requirements to keep certain data within a country or region. While most businesses (91%) believe that their data would be inherently safer if stored within their country or region, 86% also said that a global provider, operating at scale, can better protect their data compared to a local provider.

Privacy: a valuable investment

Over the past five years, privacy spending has more than doubled, benefits have trended up and returns have remained strong. This year, 95% indicated that privacy’s benefits exceed its costs, and the average organisation reports getting privacy benefits of 1.6 times their spending. Further, 80% indicated getting significant ‘loyalty and trust’ benefits from their privacy investments, and this is even higher (92%) for the most privacy-mature organisations.

In 2023, large organisations (more than 10,000 employees) increased their privacy spending by 7–8% since last year. However, smaller organisations saw lower investment, for example, businesses with 50–249 employees, decreased their privacy investment by a fourth on average.

Top image credit: iStock.com/kutubQ

Related News

China-linked attackers exploiting trusted relationships

A new report from CrowdStrike finds that China-nexus adversaries are increasingly exploiting...

82% of unis at high risk of email phishing: Proofpoint

Analysis from Proofpoint found that only 18% of Australian universities have implemented the...

Tesserent Academy secures ISACA training accreditation

Tesserent Academy and ALC Training have been classified as accredited cybersecurity training...


  • All content Copyright © 2024 Westwick-Farrow Pty Ltd