Framework needed to steer autonomous vehicles

Tuesday, 09 November, 2021

Framework needed to steer autonomous vehicles

A solid, collective ethical framework developed by government, citizens and other stakeholders must be built to steer the introduction of new road rules for connected and automated vehicles (CAVs), according to international experts.

They warn that strictly forbidding CAVs of various kinds to break existing traffic rules may hamper road safety, contrary to what most people may claim. However, this requires close scrutiny so these high-tech vehicles can meet their potential to reduce road casualties.

“While they promise to minimise road safety risk, CAVs like hybrid AI systems can still create collision risk due to technological and human–system interaction issues, the complexity of traffic, interaction with other road users and vulnerable road users,” said UK transport consultant Professor Nick Reed, from Reed Mobility, in a new paper in Ethics and Information Technology.

“Ethical goal functions for CAVs would enable developers to optimise driving behaviours for safety under conditions of uncertainty while allowing for differentiation of products according to brand values.”

This part is important since it does not state that all vehicle brands should drive in exactly the same manner, which still allows brand differentiation, the researchers say.

Around the world, transport services are already putting CAVs, including driverless cars, on the road to deliver new services and freight options to improve road safety, alleviate congestion, and increase drive comfort and transport system productivity.

A recent European Commission report recommended CAVs may have to break strict traffic rules to minimise road safety risk and to operate with appropriate transparency.

Professor Reed, Flinders University Dean of Law Professor Tania Leiman and other European experts in the field of autonomous vehicle safety say the key recommendation from the EC report (Bonnefon et al, 2020) highlights the need to legislate for CAVs in various traffic and environmental conditions to exercise the equivalent of human discretionary behaviours.

This is complicated even further where there are variations in laws across different countries and regions, and cars are designed or built in one country but used in another, says Professor Leiman, from the Flinders College of Business, Government and Law.

“An automated system that has ‘deduced’ driving behaviour from training examples cannot ‘explain’ or ‘justify’ its decisions or actions in a dangerous encounter,” she said.

“This may be a problem if a manufacturer is required to explain specific behaviour in case of an incident or where civil or criminal liability is disputed.”

Speeding and mounting the curb to avoid collision are also evaluated as case studies in the research paper, with the idea that ethical goals should be established by extensive public consultation and deliberation to make them publicly acceptable and understood.

The researchers say it will be critical that there is a standardised framework to enable vehicles travelling from one jurisdiction into the next to update their road rules to make driving standards safe, predictable, reasonable, uniform, comfortable and explainable — for drivers, manufacturers and all road users.

"We suggest responsibility for creating the framework of CAV ethical goal functions should sit with an appropriate international body — for example, the Global Forum for Road Traffic Safety of the UNECE — and relevant individual country agencies such as the Department of Transport,” said co-author on the paper Dr Leon Kester, senior research scientist at TNO, The Netherlands.

“Once an ethical goal function has been agreed and enacted by legislators, CAV systems could be designed in such a way that they optimise with the highest utility for road users within predefined boundaries without having a predefined set of infinite scenarios and precise definitions on what to do,” Dr Kester said.

“Also, we have to organise a sociotechnological feedback loop where things can be evaluated and changed if we feel it is no longer according to our societal goals.”

Image: Two Westfield autonomous POD vehicles tested in 2019 on the London Olympic Park site as part of the CAPRI project. Image courtesy of Nick Reed.

Related News

Govt, business and universities to monitor air quality

OPENAIR is a $2.4 million air quality monitoring research and development program led by the NSW...

ACS urges new govt to close IT skills gap

The Australian Computer Society has urged the new government to implement the society's...

Qld Business Investment Fund makes fourth investment

The Queensland Government has made a new investment in digital scheduling company Skedulo under...

  • All content Copyright © 2022 Westwick-Farrow Pty Ltd